<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamers sign petition against Left 4 Dead 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/</link>
	<description>Gaming Community for female gamer or girl gamer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgrunge</title>
		<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>bgrunge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamingangels.com/?p=14802#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>yeah, i think its more about the fact that LFD wasnt really finished upon release. There were only 4 campaigns, and only 2 of those were versus capable. Promised features like the negative achievement system, and variable director controlled routes through levels were notably absent.  The real issue here is simply the lack of content existing for a full priced game. Yes, Valve&#039;s been good to us with TF2. That doesnt excuse this kind of behavior. I&#039;m not buying a new game till I finish getting the one I&#039;ve already bought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i think its more about the fact that LFD wasnt really finished upon release. There were only 4 campaigns, and only 2 of those were versus capable. Promised features like the negative achievement system, and variable director controlled routes through levels were notably absent.  The real issue here is simply the lack of content existing for a full priced game. Yes, Valve&#8217;s been good to us with TF2. That doesnt excuse this kind of behavior. I&#8217;m not buying a new game till I finish getting the one I&#8217;ve already bought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Mallard</title>
		<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Mallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamingangels.com/?p=14802#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>so they believe a game company is not allowed to release sequels because they bought the first one? So what do they have to say about bioshock 2 or dead rising 2? Valve has been awesome with the game so far. The updates were HUGE projects and I enjoy a lot of there games. And I think that anyone who would be selfish enough to petition against a sequel to an awesome game like l4d doesn&#039;t really compose valves real fans and the game will do just as well without you. Expanded melee weapons new enemies, new cities, even new characters is not DLC I say game on valve lets try and top l4d. And maybe not so many bugs in the first release please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so they believe a game company is not allowed to release sequels because they bought the first one? So what do they have to say about bioshock 2 or dead rising 2? Valve has been awesome with the game so far. The updates were HUGE projects and I enjoy a lot of there games. And I think that anyone who would be selfish enough to petition against a sequel to an awesome game like l4d doesn&#8217;t really compose valves real fans and the game will do just as well without you. Expanded melee weapons new enemies, new cities, even new characters is not DLC I say game on valve lets try and top l4d. And maybe not so many bugs in the first release please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stealthyslyth</title>
		<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthyslyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamingangels.com/?p=14802#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Yanno I actually have to agree with them to an extent. I think they have outlined decent reasons for objecting against L4D 2. A sequel would render  the first game they purchased obsolete, and the promises of continual updates to the gameplay are void as they&#039;ll just move onto updating the sequel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yanno I actually have to agree with them to an extent. I think they have outlined decent reasons for objecting against L4D 2. A sequel would render  the first game they purchased obsolete, and the promises of continual updates to the gameplay are void as they&#8217;ll just move onto updating the sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dblueguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Dblueguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamingangels.com/?p=14802#comment-513</guid>
		<description>Valve ftw. So it seems like you just want Team Fortress 2 amount of free DLC from L4D when they are completely different games. LAME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valve ftw. So it seems like you just want Team Fortress 2 amount of free DLC from L4D when they are completely different games. LAME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RachelZoe</title>
		<link>http://www.gamingangels.com/2009/06/gamers-sign-petition-against-left-4-dead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>RachelZoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamingangels.com/?p=14802#comment-512</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t like this. Valve is VERY good to its gamers, and they have every right to do something like this. Personally, I know that I have played as much as I&#039;d like to out of L4D (for right now), and I was pretty psyched when I heard they weren&#039;t going to milk this one for three years before making another one. 

Go Valve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t like this. Valve is VERY good to its gamers, and they have every right to do something like this. Personally, I know that I have played as much as I&#8217;d like to out of L4D (for right now), and I was pretty psyched when I heard they weren&#8217;t going to milk this one for three years before making another one. </p>
<p>Go Valve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 404/412 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.gamingangels.com

Served from: www.gamingangels.com @ 2012-02-10 05:38:37 -->
